Biden’s ‘bigot’ smear vs. Trump voters: Devine

Joe Biden is America’s biggest troll.

His speech in Tulsa could not have been more disunifying, dishonest or more designed to inflame.

Who is the president’s speechwriter? Goebbels?

No, white supremacy is not a threat worse than ISIS.

No, Texas’ voter ID bill is not “a truly unprecedented assault on our democracy.”

Biden could have given an uplifting speech on Tuesday at a ceremony marking 100 years since the Tulsa Race Massacre.

Instead, he wheeled out his now-familiar refrain that democracy is “in peril” from the enemy within.

“Terrorism from white supremacy is the most lethal threat to the homeland today.” Not ISIS, not al Qaeda, white supremacists, he declared, citing “the intelligence community.”

Does he remember ISIS?

The images of its atrocities are etched into the memories of the rest of us.

ISIS gang-raped Yazidi women. It ethnically cleansed whole swathes of Iraq and Syria, slaughtering Christians and driving them out of their homes. It threw homosexuals off buildings.

You get the feeling that for Democrats, “white supremacy” means Donald Trump voters who are opposed to Biden’s agenda.
Getty Images
It set victims alight and burned them in cages. It beheaded hostages. It displayed severed heads on spikes on street roundabouts and public squares in Raqqa, the capital of its pretend-caliphate.

Its reign of terror, which lasted roughly from 2014 to 2018, was like a throwback to the barbarism of the Middle Ages.

We minimize its evil at our peril.

n guard.
The phrase conjures up images of white hoods, neo-Nazi skinheads and swastika tattoos. Where are these people and why hasn’t the FBI rounded them up?

But you get the feeling that for Democrats, “white supremacy” means Donald Trump voters who are opposed to Biden’s agenda.

If white supremacists are such a clear and present danger, then Democrats and their media allies wouldn’t have to invent crimes for them, like the Atlanta massage parlor massacre in March. Or the violent attacks on Asians in New York, most of which appear to be committed by black males.

The Capitol riot also is being rebranded as a white supremacist event, but it had nothing to do with race, unless you buy the line that Trump was a white supremacist president.

In order to claim that white supremacy is the greatest threat to our democracy, you have to widen the definition.

Essays in The Atlantic are typical of this bracket creep. It took Ta-Nehisi Coates mere months to declare, “Donald Trump is a white supremacist.”


A Tulsa Race Massacre survivor looks back on Black Wall Street tragedy
So of course, anyone who would vote for such a monster has to be a white supremacist, too.

“Whiteness brought us Donald Trump … [and] whiteness as an ­existential danger to the country and the world,” Coates wrote in 2017.

In case you wonder what “whiteness” is, it’s not really about skin color, because black people who don’t go along with the left’s talking points are deemed to be afflicted by “whiteness,” too.

An exhibit at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of African American History & Culture defined “whiteness” as “self-reliance,” “the nuclear family,” “the scientific method,” “objectivity,” “hard work,” “Christianity,” “delayed gratification” and “respect for authority.”

These attributes are a recipe for success and a happy life, but somehow dependency, family breakdown, superstition, laziness, Godlessness, disrespect for authority and instant gratification are positive attributes to be cultivated in black people.

What an insult. This is the destructive message Biden sent on Tuesday: “Young black entrepreneurs are just as capable of succeeding given the chance as white entrepreneurs are, but they don’t have lawyers, they don’t have accountants.”

It’s a cartoon view that doesn’t comprehend a world in which black people have agency, and can be successful in their own right — or even are capable of showing ID at a polling booth.

That brings us to another repellent part of Biden’s Tulsa speech.

People pay theirs respects at a memorial in honor of the victims of the shootings in Atlanta, where eight people were killed the week before, during a candle vigil in Monterrey Park, Calif., late Saturday, March 27, 2021.
People pay their respects to the victims of the shootings in Atlanta, where eight people were killed the week before, during a candlelight vigil in Monterrey Park, Calif., Saturday, March 27, 2021.
AP Photo/Damian Dovarganes
He exploited the moment to push his party’s “For the People” Act, which attempts to hijack state elections and cement Democratic rule in perpetuity.

“This sacred right [to vote] is ­under assault with an incredible intensity like I’ve never seen …

“It is simply un-American,” he declared, as if it’s an outrage to roll back emergency voting measures sneaked through by clever Democratic lawyers last year under cover of the pandemic. Tilting the playing field helped Biden win the election, but Republicans won’t be railroaded again.

That’s what Biden’s hyperventilating on new voting laws is all about.

The president could have used his Tulsa speech for healing and pointed out how far we’ve come in the past 100 years.

demonstrators chant pro-Islamic State group, slogans as they carry the group's flags in front of the provincial government headquarters in Mosul
Demonstrators chant pro-Islamic State slogans while carrying its flags in Mosul, Iraq, in 2014.
AP Photo, File
Instead he continued to mislead half the country into thinking the other half is the enemy.

It’s a dangerous game, and history will not look kindly on him if he keeps it up.

Get real, Trump backers
The idea that Donald Trump is going to take back the White House this year is just crazy. But that’s what the most fanatical Trump adherents are saying.

They see last year’s election as like a heist at Tiffany’s. You have to get the diamonds back.

Really, what happened in 2020 is more like a football game you lost because — you suspect, but can’t prove — of suspect practices by the other team cheated — but which you can’t prove. You accept the officials’ rulings and wait to play another day.

Republicans must work out why they lost and make sure it doesn’t happen again.

But they also must adhere to reality. The most important thing is to win the next election. Indulging a fantasy about Trump’s restoration to the throne will ensure that won’t happen.

President Donald Trump holds a rally on October 26, 2020 in Lititz, Pennsylvania.
President Donald Trump holds a rally in Lititz, Pennsylvania, on Oct. 26, 2020.
Mark Makela/Getty Images
Times Square hard sell
The CD sellers in Times Square are as aggressive as ever, just two weeks after one was arrested for allegedly shooting three tourists during a territorial dispute.

A friend this week was accosted by one of the peddlers who would not take no for an answer. “Are you a racist,” he snarled when my friend refused to buy a CD.

Where once the vendors used to be controlled by police and boxed into one corner of the square, now they roam free and menace everyone who walks by.

Police patrolling the area say they are powerless to stop them, and now that they have lost their qualified immunity, they aren’t even willing to try.

Print Email Hits: 120

National Black Power Convention activist says a time to ‘kill everything white in sight’ will soon come

A black rights activist at a weekend rally in Tulsa, Oklahoma, said that a time would come when black Americans would need to "kill everything white in sight."
According to a Monday report from BizPac Review, groups of black nationalists gathered in Tulsa to mark the 100-year anniversary of the Black Wall Street Massacre. The race slaughter left at approximately 300 people dead in a Tulsa neighborhood once known as "Black Wall Street."

The attack, carried out by a purportedly all-white mob, left more than 10,000 people homeless and practically demolished 40 square blocks.

In a statement to KTUL-TV, Malik Z. Shabazz, keynote speaker at the convention and national president of Black Lawyers for Justice, said, "The 100-year anniversary of the Black Wall Street Holocaust is a rallying cry to all blacks that we must fight on every front to protect the legal and human rights of our people and we must unite and organize with a zealous fierceness never witnessed before."

The station also reported that the convention's theme was "Reparations Now!"
In an early May news release, the march's organizers said that the struggle for reparations "must be escalated."

"We must fight on every front to achieve redress and reparations for the atrocities committed upon Tulsa Massacre descendants; and we must intensify the fight to achieve reparations for all 40-million blacks still grossly affected by racism, inequality, wealth disparity, police brutality and the like," a portion of the statement read. "Tulsa will mark a new beginning in the upgraded fight for reparations for black people."

Public Radio Tulsa reported that "several hundred" demonstrators took part in the weekend activities.
What else happened?
The weekend events, according to the outlet, included a Second Amendment March for Reparations, in which many participants exercised their right to carry openly.
One video of the largely peaceful march, however, highlighted an activist calling for reparations and more.

"We're pushing death to white supremacy. Death to capitalism. Death to imperialism. And death to fascism," an unidentified man can be heard saying in the video. “We are pushing an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, a head for a head, and a life for a life."

The man also said that black people were stolen from Africa to work as slaves for white people in colonial America.

“Once they die, we must understand that we can never give them the pain that they gave us," he insisted. “So once they get buried … once they are buried, we must bury them, dig them up and kill them again. Bury them. Dig them up. And kill them again."

His remarks caused the crowd to cheer.

Emboldened, the man continued, "Because that time will come when there's a rat-a-tat-tat. Black Americans will kill everything white in sight," and promised black Americans would give "crackers hell," "from the cradle to the grave."

Those groups leading the effort included the Huey P. Newton Gun Club, the Elmer Geronimo Pratt Gun Club, the New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense, the Fred Hampton Gun Club, the New Black Liberation Militia, the Panther Special Operations Command, and more.

Print Email Hits: 143

Five Oregon counties have now voted to leave state, create 'Greater Idaho'

May 19 (UPI) -- On Tuesday, voters in five counties in eastern Oregon urged county officials to begin to promote border relocation and joining Idaho.

The counties -- Malheur, Sherman, Grant, Baker and Lake -- join Jefferson and Union counties, whose voters applied to join Idaho last year, in their planned secession to what is being called "Greater Idaho."
While President Biden was favored 56 to 40 percent ahead of former President Donald Trump statewide, these five counties heavily favored Trump over Biden with up to 69-79 percent of the vote going to Trump.

The group, Move Oregon's Border for a Greater Idaho, is behind the effort. In addition to rural eastern Oregon, the planned Greater Idaho would also encompass large swathes of northeastern California.
Last year, a drive "to seek refuge from the blue states" was stalled after petitioners seeking signatures to place the item on the ballot said COVID-19 stopped their efforts.

"This election proves that rural Oregon wants out of Oregon. If Oregon really believes in liberal values such as self-determination, the Legislature won't hold our counties captive against our will," Mike McCarter, lead petitioner, said.

Last year McCarter said that the movement was a "peaceful revolution" and that the vote would be a crucial decision between rural and urban areas.
Any such change in the state's boundaries would require ratification by the Oregon Legislature, which is controlled by Democrats. From there Oregon and Idaho would have to sign a formal agreement, which will then have to be ratified by the U.S. Congress.

Congress has only allowed for such a change on three instances, the last in 1863 when West Virginia was created during the Civil War.

Future elections on similar ballot items will be held for residents of Harney County and Douglas County.

Print Email Hits: 145

Derek Chauvin requests new trial after being convicted of George Floyd's murder

Derek Chauvin requests new trial after being convicted of George Floyd's murder
Joel Shannon
Tami Abdollah

The defense attorney for former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin on Tuesday requested a new trial after Chauvin was convicted in April of second-degree murder and other charges in the death of George Floyd.

Attorney Eric J. Nelson says in the motion that Chauvin was denied a fair trial for reasons including "prosecutorial and jury misconduct; errors of law at trial," and that the resulting jury's verdict was "contrary to law."

Chauvin, who is white, was convicted in April of second-degree unintentional murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter for pressing his knee against Floyd’s neck for more than nine minutes as the Black man said he couldn’t breathe and went motionless.

Tuesday's motion, an expected development in the case, argues a number of reasons would justify a new trial. Among the most anticipated: that Judge Peter Cahill should not have denied the defense's request to change the venue of the trial.

April 28:Chauvin trial juror says he didn't feel pressure for a guilty verdict

During the trial’s jury selection, Cahill said he wouldn’t delay or move Chauvin’s trial over concerns that a $27 million settlement for Floyd’s family could taint the jury pool.

Nelson's Tuesday filing also asked the judge to impeach the verdict on the grounds that the jury committed misconduct, felt pressured, and/or failed to adhere to jury instructions, though the filing did not include details about that assertion. To impeach a verdict is to question its validity.

Mary Moriarty, the former chief public defender of Minnesota's Hennepin County, said the motion is common and that nearly all of the arguments raised were previously brought up during the trial. Attorneys frequently do so in order to preserve potential issues for an appeal.

Requesting a new trial can be an "intermediary step" for criminal defendants in addition to filing an appeal, according to BK Law Group.

In the filing, Nelson also requested a hearing to examine jury misconduct.

Tuesday's motion did not mention recent reports that juror Brandon Mitchell participated in an Aug. 28 march in Washington, D.C., to honor Martin Luther King, Jr., but Moriarty believes that may be one reason for the request. Mitchell was photographed wearing a t-shirt that framed a picture of Martin Luther King with the words "Get Your Knee Off Our Necks" and "BLM."

Mitchell, like all jurors, filled out a questionnaire regarding his viewpoint on issues like BLM and was also asked about it during jury selection.

Nelson repeatedly asked Cahill during the course of the trial to sequester the jury due to the immense amount of public interest in the case, and he specifically brought up Congresswoman Maxine Waters' comment urging protesters to "get more confrontational" if Chauvin isn't convicted, which was made prior to the start of deliberations.

The motion says it resulted in "jury intimidation and potential fear of retribution among jurors."

"I think he (Nelson) wants a very broad inquiry (but) the judge is not going to do that. I can pretty much guarantee that," Moriarty said.

Moriarty said one reason for the request may also be to get potential issues of juror misconduct into the court record, because that is what an appeals court would solely reference in their review of potential issues that would demand a new case.

Chauvin is scheduled to be sentenced in June. Minnesota's attorney general last week filed paperwork asking that Chauvin be given a more severe prison sentence in the case, arguing that the former Minneapolis police officer inflicted torturous deadly methods as Floyd pleaded for his life.

“Mr. Floyd was treated with particular cruelty. ... Defendant continued to maintain his position atop Mr. Floyd even as Mr. Floyd cried out that he was in pain, even as Mr. Floyd exclaimed 27 times that he could not breathe, and even as Mr. Floyd said that Defendant’s actions were killing him,” Minnesota's Attorney General Keith Ellison said. He added that Chauvin stayed in position as Floyd cried out for his mother, stopped speaking and lost consciousness.

Prosecutors also wrote that Chauvin's actions "inflicted gratuitous pain" and psychological distress not just on Floyd but on the civilian bystanders who they argued will be haunted by the memory of what they saw.

Four of the people in the crowd watching Floyd die were minors, the court filing said.




Print Email Hits: 189

Professor says she limits 'interactions' with white people 'as much as possible'

An Iowa State University professor raised eyebrows after revealing that she limits "interactions" with white people "as much as possible."
She also complained that white men "with dirty hair and wrinkled clothes" will always be "liked and higher ranked."

The professor's tweets are protected at the time of this reporting.

What are the details?
According to a Tuesday report from Campus Reform, Professor Rita Mookerjee, who spoke on a student government "Diversity and Inclusion Panel in March," reportedly tweeted that she tries to "limit my interactions with yt people as much as possible."

"I can't with the self-importance and performance esp during Black History Month," she said in a since-deleted tweet.

Iowa State's Young Americans for Freedom tweeted about Mookerjee's remarks and wrote, "ISUStuGov, do you still plan on hosting this professor for Women's Week after she has made repeated racist claims against women of a different race?"
The outlet also reported that in 2020, she complained about how "whyte men with dirty hair and wrinkled clothes will always be liked and higher ranked."
She also reportedly complained that a person mistook her for a white person on social media, so she was forced to change her profile picture.
"Someone called me white the other day so #NewProfilePic because I think the f*** not," she tweeted, according to the outlet.

In a statement, the university's student government group said that while Mookerjee's remarks did not "reflect the views of the student government," it would not remove her from the upcoming Women's Week panel.

A portion of the statement said, "Student government does not agree with the content of the comments that were made — no one should be reduced to the color of their skin."

It later added, "The tweets from the panelist do not reflect the views of Student Government: we believe that prejudice based on race or the color of someone's skin is wrong in all accounts. We have decided that the professor will still be invited to participate in the panel; it is important to allow ideas to be shared, even if the find the comments to be wrong. In order to have a true free marketplace of ideas, we must not rescind an offer to speak based on our objection to someone's personal speech."
Charles Klapatauskas, president of Young Americans for Freedom at the school, told the outlet, "YAF was not supportive of the decision to not remove Dr. Mookerjee from the women's panel."

"YAF might disagree with the content of the tweets, [but] we firmly stand behind her ability to tweet out such things," Klapatauskas added.

PS In my opion separatism will be the future..

Print Email Hits: 182

More Articles ...